Rape by any other name: Addendum to "300" review
I am disappointed, though not surprised, that there have been comments on my review of 300 indicating that I am either stupid or didn't actually watch the movie or both, since what transpired between Theron and Gorgo wasn't actually rape. These comments won't be published here at HC, because we've decided there is enough bile spewed on the Internet and it doesn't need to be added to in our space. Feel free to disagree with us in the comments, but do it respectfully, please. Keep an eye out on the sidebar for our new comments policy in the near future.
That being said, the issue that has been brought up is one that is probably worth discussing, as there are apparently a lot of people out there who didn't see Theron rape Gorgo in 300. After all, Theron certainly couldn't be convicted of rape in a U.S. court, right? Well, no, he probably couldn't, but that doesn't make it not rape. When a man forces a woman to have sex with him, with the consequence of refusing being her husband's likely death, and then says "This will not be over quickly. You will not enjoy this" while thrusting into her, that is certainly rape enough for me. Rape is not just what happens when a woman is attacked in the dead of night by a stranger with a mask and a gun. Rape is what happens when a man forces himself on a woman that does not want to have sex with him. She does not have to fight for it to be rape. He does not have to threaten her with death for it to be rape. It does not have to be prosecutable for it to be rape.
What Theron did to Gorgo probably represents one of the most common types of rape around. He had something she needed, and he held it over her head until she "consented." But consent in the face of dire consequences otherwise is not consent. Consent to protect one's loved ones, or in the face of blackmail, is not consent.
It has been suggested that what Gorgo actually sold herself to Theron in exchange for his promise of cooperation in the council, and thus it was more prostitution that rape. To me, this is a pretty meaningless distinction. Theron had already made it clear that he was going to get what he wanted from Gorgo one way or the other, threatening to strangle her only moments before. Gorgo was facing the death of her husband and the fall of her country if she didn't stop it. There wasn't another option. That's coercion.
It honestly blows my mind that people are so confused as to what does and does not constitute rape, in the moral realm if not the legal one. It's very, very simple. Rape is having sex with an unwilling partner. Whether that partner fights, or screams, or cries, or whether you have promised that partner something in return is, in the end, meaningless. And Theron raped Gorgo, just as much as if he'd physically forced her or held a knife to her throat. That a viewer could watch the scene and not see that honestly disturbs and saddens me, and makes me wonder how we're ever going to get to a place where rape is eradicated, when the men and even the women in our society don't even see it for what it is.

Comments
I didn't see 300, but did teach criminal law and if Theron threatened to kill Gorgo's husband if she didn't have sex with him, Theron absolutely could be convicted of rape in the US ... well, if it happened in the US.
Posted by: Scott Anderson | March 29, 2007 8:15 AM
Well, he didn't threated to kill her husband, just to not help her try to save him.
Posted by: Grace | March 29, 2007 9:18 AM
Either way, I think this could reasonably be interpreted as duress.
Posted by: Skye | March 29, 2007 12:32 PM
You know, I was not aware anyone was claiming it was not rape. Every person I have talked to (whether they liked the movie or not) described it as rape.
Posted by: Thom | March 30, 2007 1:13 PM
I was part of a blog thread a while ago about rape that veered off into discussions about sexual harrassment. At some point one guy made some comment about how of course no one expects her do sleep with him or do anything other than report the harrasser.
And I just couldn't get over how un-empathetic and unrealistic and stupid his response was.
Yes, we hope that she would say no and file charges, but what if there are people depending on the paycheck she brings home? Should we then pretend it's all ok because she gave in? There is a reason why sexual harrassment is a serious offense and not just some guy being a jerk.
Sadly enough, the law agrees with the idiot. When it comes to just about every other crime, "normal" blackmailers included, perpetrators get into more trouble - not less - if they are successful. And yet there is no legally defined crime between sexual harrassment and rape, and the act of a victim capitulating to a sexual harrasser very rarely fits the legal definition of rape. Often her capitulation makes the original offense even harder to prosecute.
So, it's sad and depressing that so many people don't see what happened in 300 as rape - even morally - but it's because society does a pretty damn good job of telling them it's not.
Posted by: Mickle | March 30, 2007 3:42 PM
Can I have an amen. To me and any other self-respecting human rights activist, rape is rape. I knew when I saw it, though, that there were going to be people who say otherwise. Let's hope they never get into positions of power.
UNfortunately, I walked out of the theater when that scene happened, so I did not get to see her bad-ass revenge. Thanks for reviewing it.
Posted by: Ashalyn | April 8, 2007 10:41 AM
Thanks for bringing this up. This is very true and it should be realized that this act in the movie was rape, take it offensively or not (though I do). The fact that people may even blame the act on Gorgo is pretty horrible and just shows a very male-biased and misogynist viewpoint. I'm writing a paper on women's roles in war and sacrifices in supporting their husband and country that go unrecognized and I have sited this scene in the movie 300.
Posted by: Catie | June 10, 2007 4:25 PM
Kudos to the entire post. That's pretty much all I needt say : )
Posted by: Anicia | October 21, 2007 5:03 AM
Wow. I too was not aware that there were people out there denying the existence of rape in the movie. In my honest opinion, I don't see how anyone could interpret it as anything less than non-consented violation. It was forced upon her, and was most definitely AGAINST her will... That, ladies and gentlemen, is rape.
Great article, very articulate.
Posted by: Andrew R | January 21, 2008 3:20 PM